![]() Perhaps you can see why my trust in these tools is so low. I get the impression it didn’t execute JavaScript, because anything that came onto the page via JavaScript was left unstyled. Many of them are fairly similar, but all of them have the potential of having selectors that are used. It gave me the opportunity to put in other URLs (which is nice) but there are tens of thousands of URLs on CSS-Tricks. On the right, I applied the new “purified” CSS, which deleted a bunch of CSS necessary for other pages. Oooops! On the left, CSS-Tricks as normal. Here’s me dropping my into Purif圜SS Online and getting new CSS. Here’s an example of my concern playing out: Purif圜SS Online takes some URLs and instantly provides a copy-pasteable chunk of CSS to use This is too complex for automated tooling to promise their approach works perfectly, particularly when factoring in the unknowns of browser context (different screen sizes, different capabilities, different browsers) and third parties. Otherwise, you might end up deleting the dropdown styling for the credit card choice dropdown in the pop-up modal that appears for users with a disabled account who’ve logged in during their grace period that also have a gift card to apply. You gotta dig through every page, including states that aren’t always top-of-mind, not to mention all of the edge-case scenarios. Checking all your top-level pages doesn’t count. ![]() in every possible combination of media queries you’ve used.Ĭhecking your homepage doesn’t count.under every possible combination of state…. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |